History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Richard Garcia
695 F. App'x 79
| 5th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JONES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*

The panel entered a limited remand in this case in an opinion dated August 1, 2017. Upon receipt of the district court’s order dated August 7, 2017, the panel now files this supplement to our prior opinion. The district court order states that the district court “did not consider new information in the Addendum to deny Garcia’s motion” for a 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction. The denial of the sentence reduction was based on Garcia’s past criminal history and his continued threat to public safety. Therefore, as the *2 Case: 15-40817 Document: 00514115158 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2017

No. 15-40817

court did not consider the new evidence in the Addendum, there was no error. Therefore we AFFIRM the district court.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Richard Garcia
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 14, 2017
Citation: 695 F. App'x 79
Docket Number: 15-40817
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.