Case Information
*1 Before DREW, MAYBERRY, and DENNIS, Appellate Military Judges.
________________________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4. ________________________
PER CURIAM:
The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Arti- cles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).
United States v. Greene , No. ACM S32427
Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED . [1] FOR THE COURT
KURT J. BRUBAKER
Clerk of the Court
[1] We note the staff judge advocate’s recommendation (SJAR) failed to advise the con- vening authority of the confinement limitations imposed by the pretrial agreement in this case. We find this error harmless, however, as the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as complied with the pretrial agreement. Similarly, the addendum to the SJAR failed to advise the convening authority of Appellant’s re- quest to have his rank restored. This error was likewise harmless in light of the con- vening authority’s indorsement that she reviewed and considered all matters submit- ted by Appellant prior to taking action. 2