History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Mustafa Muhammad v.
694 F. App'x 212
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mustafa Muhammad, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mustafa Muhammad petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for new trial. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Mustafa Muhammad v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 10, 2017
Citation: 694 F. App'x 212
Docket Number: 17-1764
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.