History
  • No items yet
midpage
De' Andre Starnes v. Gilbarco Veeder-Root
694 F. App'x 200
4th Cir.
2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

De’ Andre Starnes, Appellant Pro Se. James Marion Powell, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

De’ Andre Starnes appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Starnes’ motion for leave to file an amended informal brief, deny the motion to appoint counsel, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Starnes v. Veeder-Root , No. 1:15-cv-01002-WO-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: De' Andre Starnes v. Gilbarco Veeder-Root
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 4, 2017
Citation: 694 F. App'x 200
Docket Number: 17-1411
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.