History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Ricardo Maciel
17-10571
| 11th Cir. | Aug 3, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ricardo Maciel appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion

Case: 17-10571 Date Filed: 08/03/2017 Page: 2 of 2

to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Maciel claims that he is entitled to relief based on Amendment 801 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We disagree. Section 3582(c)(2) allows relief only in accordance with the policy statements of the Sentencing Commission. And the Commission’s policy statement, which is codified at U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, allows for sentence reductions based only on amendments to the guidelines that are specifically listed in § 1B1.10(d). Because Amendment 801 is not listed there, Maciel is not entitled to relief.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Ricardo Maciel
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Aug 3, 2017
Docket Number: 17-10571
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.