History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Michael Matthews
694 F. App'x 183
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael F. Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael F. Matthews appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Matthews , No. 3:07–cr–00226–REP–RCY-1 (E.D. Va. May 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Michael Matthews
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 1, 2017
Citation: 694 F. App'x 183
Docket Number: 17-6701
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.