History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilbert Gilchrist v. Dr. Lard
17-6585
| 4th Cir. | Aug 1, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*2 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbert Gilchrist, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN CLAYTOR CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wilbert Gilchrist appeals the magistrate judge’s [*] order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Gilchrist v. Lard , No. 3:14-cv-00630-RCY (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.

Case Details

Case Name: Wilbert Gilchrist v. Dr. Lard
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 1, 2017
Docket Number: 17-6585
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.