History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dr. Die Blaise v. Dr. Sandra Harris
694 F. App'x 137
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Die K. Blaise, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin D. Holden, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Die K. Blaise appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil employment action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blaise v. Harris , No. 3:16-cv-00023-REP (E.D. Va., Aug. 11, 2016 & Mar. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Dr. Die Blaise v. Dr. Sandra Harris
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 31, 2017
Citation: 694 F. App'x 137
Docket Number: 17-1377
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.