The trial court’s certification in this appeal states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)(2).

This court must dismiss this appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

04-17-00378-CR On June 16, 2017, we notified Appellant that this appeal would be dismissed under Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that Appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by July 17, 2017. See T EX . R.A PP . P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.).

On July 17, 2017, Appellant’s court-appointed counsel, John J. Ritenour Jr., filed a response stating that counsel had reviewed the record, and counsel conceded that this court must dismiss this appeal.

Given Rule 25.2(d)’s requirements, the record, and Appellant’s response, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d); Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 613.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -