History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Smith, J.
169 A.3d 1067
Pa.
2017
Check Treatment

*1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT M.D. Appeal Dkt. 36 MAP 2017 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 138 MAL 2017

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : JONATHAN NELSON SMITH, :

: Respondent : ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED . The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) The Pennsylvania Superior Court’s Opinion misapplies the Deadly Weapon Used

enhancement, which leads to a result inconsistent with statutory construction by reading an additional specific intent element into the Deadly Weapon Used statute that does not exist in the plain language[.]

(2) The Pennsylvania Superior Court rendered a decision that is inconsistent with

the plain language of Commonwealth v. Buterbaugh , infra , and thereby leads to a misapplication of Buterbaugh and an irreconcilable conflict between Superior Court case law[.]

(3) The Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision is inconsistent with fundamental

notions of mens rea and the applicability of mens rea when no mens rea is specifically stated, improperly creating a default mens rea of specific intent.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Smith, J.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 26, 2017
Citation: 169 A.3d 1067
Docket Number: Commonwealth v. Smith, J. - No. 138 MAL 2017 (Granted)
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.