History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jo Benoit v. Barbara Rickard
693 F. App'x 259
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jo Benoit, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jo Benoit, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying her motion for reconsideration of the denial of her motions to compel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny her motion to compel in this court and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Benoit v. Rickard , No. 1:16-cv-00073 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Jo Benoit v. Barbara Rickard
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 25, 2017
Citation: 693 F. App'x 259
Docket Number: 17-6487
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.