History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. David Huggard
693 F. App'x 257
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Huggard, Appellant Pro Se. Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David L. Huggard appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for judicial recusal and the production of documents. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Huggard , No. 1:13-cr-00005-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2017). We deny Huggard’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. David Huggard
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 25, 2017
Citation: 693 F. App'x 257
Docket Number: 17-6457
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.