History
  • No items yet
midpage
Horace Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
693 F. App'x 232
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Horace T. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Ira Brown, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Huntington, West Virginia; Erika Jensene Karnaszewski Fedelini, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Horace T. Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , No. 3:16-cv-00174-JAG (E.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Horace Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 24, 2017
Citation: 693 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: 17-1396
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.