History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mark Lynn Shrader v. State
03-17-00105-CR
| Tex. App. | Jul 18, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-17-00105-CR Mark Lynn Shrader, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 76165, THE HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide *2 written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before July 28, 2017 . See id. at 321.

It is ordered on July 18, 2017.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Field and Bourland

Do Not Publish

Case Details

Case Name: Mark Lynn Shrader v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jul 18, 2017
Docket Number: 03-17-00105-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.