History
  • No items yet
midpage
Musselman v. Army
16-2522
| Fed. Cir. | Jul 20, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*2 Before P ROST , Chief Judge , N EWMAN , L OURIE , D YK , O’M ALLEY , R EYNA , W ALLACH , T ARANTO , C HEN , H UGHES ,

and S TOLL , Circuit Judges . ∗ W ALLACH , Circuit Judge, with whom N EWMAN and O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judges, join, dissent from the denial of the petition for hearing en banc for the reasons stated in the dissent from denial of the petition for rehearing en banc in Fedora v. Merit Systems Protection Board , No. 15-

3039 . S TOLL , Circuit Judge , dissents without opinion from the

denial of the petition for hearing en banc.

P ER C URIAM .

O R D E R Petitioner Jeffery S. Musselman filed a petition for in- itial hearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by respondent Department of the Army. The petition and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The petition for initial hearing en banc is denied.

F OR THE C OURT July 20, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court ∗ Circuit Judge Moore did not participate.

Case Details

Case Name: Musselman v. Army
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Jul 20, 2017
Docket Number: 16-2522
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.