History
  • No items yet
midpage
Phillip Fields v. David Robinson
693 F. App'x 201
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip W. Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Phillip W. Fields appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants and denying his cross-motion for summary judgment in his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2012). Applying a de novo standard of review, Lawson v. Union Cty. Clerk of Court , 828 F.3d 239, 247 (4th Cir. 2016); Henson v. Liggett Grp., Inc. , 61 F.3d 270, 274 (4th Cir. 1995), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s judgment. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fields v. Robinson , No. 3:15-cv-00455-HEH (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Phillip Fields v. David Robinson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 18, 2017
Citation: 693 F. App'x 201
Docket Number: 17-6231
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.