History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Alondra Rodriguez
|
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Alondra Salinas Rodriguez was found guilty of petit theft, Idaho Code § 18-2407. The district court imposed a 365-day sentence in the county jail. Rodriguez appeals, contending that her sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

1

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Rodriguez’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

2

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Alondra Rodriguez
Court Name: Idaho Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 17, 2017
Court Abbreviation: Idaho Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.