History
  • No items yet
midpage
LARRY PRICE VS. BHADO AND BHADO DEVELOPMENT, LLC(L-3854-15, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
A-2504-15T2
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
Jul 11, 2017
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2504-15T2 LARRY PRICE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BHADO and BHADO DEVELOPMENT, LLC

and UNION CITY ZONING BOARD OF

ADJUSTMENT,

Defendants-Respondents.

________________________________

Argued June 6, 2017 — Decided July 11, 2017 Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Docket No. L- 3854-15.

Larry Price, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Gregory F. Kotchick argued the cause for respondent Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment (Durkin and Durkin LLP, attorneys; Mr. Kotchick, of counsel and on the brief). Alonso and Navarrete, LLC, attorneys for respondent Bhado and Bhado Development, LLC, join in the brief of respondent Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment.

PER CURIAM

The parties to the appeal have settled the issues between them. In accordance with their consent order of dismissal, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

2 A-2504-15T2

Case Details

Case Name: LARRY PRICE VS. BHADO AND BHADO DEVELOPMENT, LLC(L-3854-15, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Jul 11, 2017
Docket Number: A-2504-15T2
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.