Case Information
*1 Before C AMPBELL , F ULTON , and H UTCHISON , Appellate Military
Judges _________________________
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). T he supplemental promulgating order will reflect that following the merger of Specifications 2 and 5 under Charge I, Specification 2 reads as follows: In that Hospitalman Apprentice Samuel T. Boyles, U.S. Navy Reserves, on active duty, did, at an unknown location, on or about 10 January 2016, commit a lewd act upon D.M.S., a child who had not attained the age of 16 years, to wit: intentionally communicating indecent language to D.M.S., through communication technology, and intentionally sending a digital image of an erect penis to D.M.S. through communication technology with an intent to arouse
United States v. Boyles , No. 201700100 or gratify his sexual desire. United States v. Crumpley , 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL
Clerk of Court 2
