*1 Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Lamont Tyshawn Tarkington appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion for disclosure of cell site and cell tower records obtained by a federal grand jury under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(3)(E)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. *2 Tarkington’s motion was accompanied by copies of the records he seeks.

Although he contended that the records were altered and incomplete, he adduced no evidence to support his claim. Under these circumstances, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Tarkington’s motion. See Douglas Oil Co. of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest , 441 U.S. 211, 228 (1979) (district court’s decision under Rule 6(e) reviewed for abuse of discretion).

AFFIRMED.

2 14-50530

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).