History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ronald McClary v. Mitchell Lawson
692 F. App'x 709
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Nathan Douglas Childs, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Charles Houston Foppiano, Gary Adam Moyers, BATTEN LEE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald McClary appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing McClary’s civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Lawson , No. 5:14-ct-03147-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Ronald McClary v. Mitchell Lawson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 30, 2017
Citation: 692 F. App'x 709
Docket Number: 17-6313
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.