History
  • No items yet
midpage
in the Interest of E.J., J.J., V.J., and C.J.., Children
10-16-00417-CV
| Tex. App. | Jun 21, 2017
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-16-00417-CV IN THE INTEREST OF E.J., J.J., V.J., AND C.J., CHILDREN From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 15-000408-CV-85 O R D E R

On June 1, 2017, appellants, Jennifer and Jason, filed a motion to exceed the word limit in their pro se response to their appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and supporting Anders brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Notwithstanding that this is a “response” not contemplated by the word limit for briefs, we nevertheless grant the motion and have filed the response.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed June 21, 2017

Case Details

Case Name: in the Interest of E.J., J.J., V.J., and C.J.., Children
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 21, 2017
Docket Number: 10-16-00417-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.