History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ken Davis v. Robert McCabe
692 F. App'x 138
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ken C. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Lewis Stone, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ken C. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Davis’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Davis has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc. , 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Ken Davis v. Robert McCabe
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 23, 2017
Citation: 692 F. App'x 138
Docket Number: 17-6216
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.