History
  • No items yet
midpage
Middleton v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
692 F. App'x 129
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taneshia Laverne Middleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Taneshia Laverne Middleton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Middleton v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin. , No. 8:15-cv-00299-BHH (D.S.C. Aug. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Middleton v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 23, 2017
Citation: 692 F. App'x 129
Docket Number: 16-2205
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.