History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clarence Miller v. Kimberly Garvin
691 F. App'x 778
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Scott Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Columbia, South Carolina, and Drew Hamilton Butler, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Scott Miller appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Miller’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 motion for failure to comply with a discovery order and for lack of prosecution under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 & 41. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Garvin , No. 6:15-cv-00108-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 8, 2016). We deny Miller’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Clarence Miller v. Kimberly Garvin
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 22, 2017
Citation: 691 F. App'x 778
Docket Number: 16-6604
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.