History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Vivek Shah v.
691 F. App'x 787
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vivek Shah, petitioner pro se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vivek Shah petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Shah’s petition and supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Vivek Shah v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 22, 2017
Citation: 691 F. App'x 787
Docket Number: 17-1294
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.