History
  • No items yet
midpage
Robert Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline
691 F. App'x 789
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lauter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard J. Cromwell, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lauter appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline , No. 2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Robert Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 22, 2017
Citation: 691 F. App'x 789
Docket Number: 17-1304
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.