History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pestana v. Palm Springs General Hospital, Inc.
16-0685
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Jun 21, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before LAGOA, SALTER, and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

The appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order granting final summary judgment in favor of the appellee. “[S]ummary judgment is appropriate where, as a *2 matter of law, it is apparent from the pleadings, depositions, affidavits, or other evidence that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to relief as a matter of law.” Fla. Bar v. Greene, 926 So. 2d 1195, 1200 (Fla. 2006). Given the record before us, there was no genuine issue of material fact and the appellee was entitled to relief as a matter of law. Id.; See Sokoloff v. Oceania I Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 201 So. 3d 664, 664-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Affirmed.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Pestana v. Palm Springs General Hospital, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 21, 2017
Docket Number: 16-0685
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.