*1 Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Arce-Ordones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arce-Ordones has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Arce-Ordones’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the *2 Case: 16-40934 Document: 00514039657 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017

No. 16-40934

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.