32:T4a2,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Zucker v. Hassell, 606, 2016","datePublished":"2017-06-19","legislationDate":"2017-06-19","citation":"Zucker v. Hassell, No. 606, 2016 (Del. Jun 19, 2017)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of Delaware","description":"Read the full text of Zucker v. Hassell (Zucker v. Hassell, No. 606, 2016 (Del. Jun 19, 2017)). This legal opinion, filed in 2017-06-19, from the Supreme Court of Delaware discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/zucker-v-hassell--4178861"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/zucker-v-hassell--4178861","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Zucker v. Hassell, Supreme Court of Delaware, Zucker v. Hassell, No. 606, 2016 (Del. Jun 19, 2017)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T47f,

*1 Before VALIHURA , VAUGHN and SEITZ , Justices.

O R D E R

This 19 th day of June 2017, the Court, having considered this matter on the oral arguments and briefs of the parties, has concluded that the same should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its Memorandum Opinion of November 30, 2016.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice 2