History
  • No items yet
midpage
Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill
124A16
| N.C. | Jun 9, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 124A16 Filed 9 June 2017 JILLIAN MURRAY

v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 782 S.E.2d 531 (2016), dismissing an appeal from an order entered on 6 November 2014 by Judge Carl R. Fox in Superior Court, Orange County, and remanding the case for further proceedings. On 9 June 2016, the Supreme Court allowed defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court on 21 March 2017.

Law Firm of Henry Clay Turner, PLLC, by Henry Clay Turner, for plaintiff- appellee.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, and Laura Howard McHenry, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to the additional issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Case Details

Case Name: Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 9, 2017
Docket Number: 124A16
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.