History
  • No items yet
midpage
Qaiser v. Small Business Administration
691 F. App'x 705
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charity Chidinma Emeronye Swift, Stephen Christopher Swift, SWIFT & SWIFT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Andrew S. Han, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Amnah Qaiser appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to amend her complaint and granting Defendants summary judgment on Qaiser’s discrimination and hostile work environment harassment claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and have considered the parties’ arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Quaiser v. SBA , No. 1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 18, 2016 & entered Mar. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Qaiser v. Small Business Administration
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 7, 2017
Citation: 691 F. App'x 705
Docket Number: 16-1586
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.