History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kenneth Bond v. Lt. Clark
691 F. App'x 132
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Bond appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment on his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), dismissing his complaint, and denying his request for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bond v. Clark , No. 1:16-cv-00138-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 10, 2016 & entered Nov. 11, 2016; Dec. 14, 2016). We deny Bond’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Kenneth Bond v. Lt. Clark
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 6, 2017
Citation: 691 F. App'x 132
Docket Number: 16-7770
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.