History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shaun Rosiere v.
690 F. App'x 93
3rd Cir.
2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: June 2, 2017) _________ OPINION [*] _________ PER CURIAM

Shaun Rosiere seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the District Court to rule on three motions pending in the underlying criminal matter concerning the terms of his supervised release. By order entered April 5, 2017, the District Court denied each motion. In light of the District Court’s action, this mandamus petition no longer presents a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny *2 Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”).

2

[*] This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

Case Details

Case Name: Shaun Rosiere v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: Jun 2, 2017
Citation: 690 F. App'x 93
Docket Number: 17-1092
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.