History
  • No items yet
midpage
Althea Hughes v. Bank of America
691 F. App'x 92
4th Cir.
2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Althea Marie Hughes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Althea Marie Hughes appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for failure to state a claim for relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hughes v. Bank of Am. , No. 3:16-cv-00672-HEH (E.D. Va. Feb. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Althea Hughes v. Bank of America
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 31, 2017
Citation: 691 F. App'x 92
Docket Number: 17-1453
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.