History
  • No items yet
midpage
George Altman v. Warden Hollenbaek
691 F. App'x 98
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Riley Altman, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Riley Altman, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Altman v. Hollenbaek , No. 5:15-hc-02256-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: George Altman v. Warden Hollenbaek
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 31, 2017
Citation: 691 F. App'x 98
Docket Number: 17-6213
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.