History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Doretha Selby-Diggs
691 F. App'x 86
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Doretha Selby-Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Patrick Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; V. Kathleen Dougherty, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doretha Selby-Diggs appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to compel the filing of a motion for a sentence reduction based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Selby-Diggs , No. 2:14-cr-00137- RBS-RJK-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Doretha Selby-Diggs
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 31, 2017
Citation: 691 F. App'x 86
Docket Number: 17-6286
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.