History
  • No items yet
midpage
Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
690 F. App'x 842
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Eugene Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Ballantine Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Glenn G. Patton, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Eugene Buckner appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Union Carbide Corp. v. Richards , 721 F.3d 307, 314-15 (4th Cir. 2013); Foy v. Giant Food Inc. , 298 F.3d 284, 287-88 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buckner v. United Parcel Serv. , No. 5:16-cv-00644-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 30, 2017
Citation: 690 F. App'x 842
Docket Number: 17-1127
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.