History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tall v. Maryland Developmental Disabilities Administration
690 F. App'x 841
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Jean Coleman, William G. Dunlap, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hesman Tall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). “We review a district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) de novo,” Demetres v. E. W. Const., Inc. , 776 F.3d 271, 272 (4th Cir. 2015), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tall v. Md. Developmental Disabilities Admin. , No. 1:15-cv-03811-ELH (D. Md. filed on Dec. 29, 2016 & entered Dec. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Tall v. Maryland Developmental Disabilities Administration
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 30, 2017
Citation: 690 F. App'x 841
Docket Number: 17-1066
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.