History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Albury Francis
690 F. App'x 837
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albury Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Philip Holbrook, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ethan A. Ontjes, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albury Francis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Francis , No. 5:01-cr-00094-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed June 22, 2016 & entered June 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Albury Francis
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 30, 2017
Citation: 690 F. App'x 837
Docket Number: 16-6963
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.