History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Catherine Randolph v.
17-1211
| 4th Cir. | May 25, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s orders returning her complaints because they were not in compliance with the prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Catherine Randolph v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 25, 2017
Docket Number: 17-1211
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.