History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reath v. Social Security Administration
689 F. App'x 755
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kimberly A. Reath, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kimberly A. Reath seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing her complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on April 14, 2016. The notice of appeal was filed on February 16, 2017. Because Reath failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Reath v. Social Security Administration
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 25, 2017
Citation: 689 F. App'x 755
Docket Number: 17-1228
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.