History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Maurice Hardy
689 F. App'x 765
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Marie Celeste, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Peter Jeffrey Martinez, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. May , F.3d , , No. 15-7912, 2017 WL 1479288, at *4-5 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2017). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hardy , No. 1:11-cr-00358-ELH-2 (D. Md. July 12, 2016 & July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Maurice Hardy
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 25, 2017
Citation: 689 F. App'x 765
Docket Number: 16-7011
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.