*1 Before LAGOA, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

John E. Ramos, pro se, appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, claiming that the written order contains findings that to do not comport with the *2 court’s oral rulings at the final hearing, and that the court erred in permitting the appellee’s counsel in the divorce proceedings to submit a proposed final judgment for the court’s consideration. Concluding that no error has been demonstrated by the record before us, we affirm. See Valladares v. Junco-Valladares, 30 So. 3d 519, 522-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (“The standard of review for divorce proceedings is abuse of discretion. ‘The findings and judgment of the trial court come to us clothed with a presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed upon appeal in the absence of a record demonstrating errors of law.’” (quoting Merritt v. Williams, 295 So. 2d 310, 311 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974))); Bryan v. Bryan, 930 So. 2d 693, 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (recognizing that, in a marital dissolution proceeding, the trial court may permit either party, or both parties, to submit a proposed final judgment).

Affirmed.

2