History
  • No items yet
midpage
Turnbull Group, LLC v. Carfax, Inc.
689 F. App'x 226
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryan G. Hale, GOFORTH HALE LLC, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellant. Christopher Landau, P.C., Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C., Christa Laser, KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Turnbull Group, LLC, appeals the district court’s order dismissing its class action complaint against Carfax, Inc., for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turnbull Grp., LLC v. Carfax, Inc. , No. 1:16-cv-00646-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. Sept. 2, 2016). We grant Carfax’s motion to submit on the briefs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Turnbull Group, LLC v. Carfax, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 23, 2017
Citation: 689 F. App'x 226
Docket Number: 16-2144
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.