History
  • No items yet
midpage
R. DiPrete v. 950 Fairview Street, LLC
689 F. App'x 223
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

R. Francis DiPrete, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Tayloe Copeland, COPELAND & BIEGER, PC, Abingdon, Virginia; Robert Lucas Hobbs, ELLIOTT, LAWSON & MINOR, PC, Bristol, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

R. Francis DiPrete seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Michael Cosola, one of the three Defendants to DiPrete’s complaint; the action remains pending as to the other two Defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order DiPrete seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: R. DiPrete v. 950 Fairview Street, LLC
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 22, 2017
Citation: 689 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: 16-2335
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.