Case Information
*1 Before MAYBERRY, HARDING, and C. BROWN, Appellate Military Judges.
________________________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4. ________________________
United States v. Workneh , No. ACM 38928 (f rev)
PER CURIAM:
This case is back before our court for further review because the original convening authority’s action contained errors. United States v. Workneh , ACM No. 38928, 2017 CCA LEXIS 219, at *10 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 24 Mar. 2017). On 4 May 2017, the convening authority withdrew the erroneous action in ac- cordance with our original decision and issued a corrected action. A corrected court-martial order was also executed.
Having resolved that issue, the approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Jus- tice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). Accordingly, the approved findings and sen- tence are AFFIRMED .
FOR THE COURT
KURT J. BRUBAKER
Clerk of the Court
2
[1] Ms. Herrell was a law student extern with the Air Force Legal Operations Agency and was at all times supervised by attorneys admitted to practice before this court.