History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leodegario Salvador v. Bank of America, N.A.
690 F. App'x 1002
| 9th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Leodegario Salvador appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his diversity action seeking to quiet title. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Owen , 519 *2 F.3d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Salvador failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Bank of America’s interest in the subject property had been extinguished by the foreclosure sale. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3116 (a Homeowners Association (“HOA”) has a “super priority” lien with respect to other liens, and the HOA’s super priority lien may constitute up to nine months of HOA fees); SFR Invs. Pool 1 v. U.S. Bank, N.A. , 334 P.3d 409, 414 (Nev. 2014) (a holder of a first deed of trust may preserve its interest in the subject property if the amount of the super priority lien is tendered prior to the HOA foreclosure sale).

AFFIRMED.

2 16-15750

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case Details

Case Name: Leodegario Salvador v. Bank of America, N.A.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: May 17, 2017
Citation: 690 F. App'x 1002
Docket Number: 16-15750
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.