*1 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Oden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Christopher William Oden, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. ^[*] We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oden v. Wilson, No. 3:15-cv-00196-JAG-RCY (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2016 & Nov. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] We have construed Oden’s March 9, 2016 motion for a certificate of appealability as a timely notice of appeal from the district court’s order denying his § 2241 petition. See Marmolejo v. United States, 196 F.3d 377, 378 (2d Cir. 1999) (holding that motion for certificate of appealability should be treated as notice of appeal). 2