History
  • No items yet
midpage
Prentis Herndon v. Alutiiq Education and Training
16-1964
| 4th Cir. | May 5, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*2 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ramsay C. McCullough, Kristina H. Vaquera, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Prentis L. Herndon, Appellee Pro Se. Kevin Mark Cuddy, Sarah Langberg, STOEL RIVES LLP, Anchorage, Alaska, for Amici Supporting Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alutiiq Education & Training, LLC (“AET”) seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order AET seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. , 546 U.S. 500, 515-16 (2006); see also 43 U.S.C. § 1626(g) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and deny Herndon’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case Details

Case Name: Prentis Herndon v. Alutiiq Education and Training
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 5, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1964
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.